“He wept over his fate”, according to a royal biographer

Meghan Markle cried at Elizabeth II’s funeral: “She cried for her fate”, according to a royal biographer. (REUTERS/Toby Melville)

The tears shed by Meghan Markle at the funeral of the Queen of England clearly did not move her detractors. Strongly criticized by a royal biographer who often attacked her, the Duchess of Sussex received a lot of support from Internet users, who denounced harassment similar to what Lady Di experienced 25 years ago.

There are always a lot of comparisons between Lady Di and Meghan Markle. However, the two women do not have much in common, except that they find themselves in the heart of the British royal family without really planning it, as well as the love that they have without measure for the Prince Harry. However, supporters of the Duchess of Sussex point to the same treatment between the latter, and what Diana Spencer suffered after her divorce from Prince Charles.

Meghan Markle’s “Crocodile Tears”.

Queen Elizabeth II died on September 8, 2022 and England has just emerged from a long period of mourning in honor of the sovereign. The ceremonies follow each other for 12 days to end on Monday, September 19 with the funeral and burial of the Queen: moments heavy with emotion for all members of the British royal family, from George and Charlotte , who was present for the occasion, to Meghan. Markle, who however has a reputation for not being very close to Her Majesty.

Video. Meghan Markle cried at Elizabeth II’s funeral, the Duchess was overwhelmed with emotion

It must be said that since the infamous “Megxit”, Prince Harry and his wife have distanced themselves from the royal family: they are no longer considered active members of the monarchy, and many rumors say that they still conflicted with some of their relatives. However, Harry has always been very close to his grandmother, to whom he pays an emotional tribute. And during the funeral, Meghan Markle wiped away her tears several times, under the watchful eye of photographers.

But for royal biographer Tom Bower, who was interviewed by GB News, it was not because of sadness that the Duchess of Sussex cried during the ceremony. “She wept over her own fate,” he said, referring to crocodile tears and a woman more likely to feel sorry for herself than for the death of her husband’s grandmother.

Meghan Markle, “good actress” according to Stéphane Bern

In very serious words, the man claimed “Was she emotional? I mean, did she really wipe away a tear or was it a trick by the Hollywood actress to make it look like she was crying? If she was crying at that moment, in I think it is for his own fortune, and not for the Queen’s.” His opinion was apparently shared by Stéphane Bern, who told Madame Figaro: “We kept the emotion of Meghan Markle, the same, and her little tears. Now, maybe she is also a very good actress.”

In short, there are many voices that doubt the sincerity of Meghan Markle, which is far from surprising, given the treatment to which she has been entitled in recent years. The question now is: why is the Duchess of Sussex feeling sorry for herself? She and her husband made the conscious choice to leave the royal family, despite the criticism. A choice that seems to allow them to progress far from the British tabloids, because they show more complicity than before during the ceremonies in honor of the queen, determined to support each other at all costs.

Meghan’s supporters denounced a form of harassment

Critics of the royal family quickly reacted to these new criticisms of Meghan Markle, remembering that the latter was targeted from the beginning of her relationship with Prince Harry. Criticized because of her status as a divorced woman and a commoner, because of her African-American origins, because of her femininity or because of her lack of respect for protocol, Prince Harry’s wife is often chosen as a villain , the one who kept the young prince away. from his title and his family.

Result: many people defended her, starting with Baroness Meral Hussein Ece, a British Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords who did not hesitate to affirm: “Princess Diana was slandered and harassed until her death, which shows if what really happened to. Meghan Markle today. This despicable abuse must stop.” An opinion shared by Nazir Afzal, chief prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service for the North West of England, who believes that “Tom Bowers could have been a ‘time of quiet reflection’ instead of continuing to pester Meghan and Harry.

Meghan Markle and Lady Di, more alike than you think?

Inevitably, this situation of harassment has created a new point of comparison between the Duchess of Sussex and the mother-in-law she has never met. Prince Harry has always been very honest about the reasons that led him to leave the royal family of Britain and England: his mental health no longer supports the pressure of the tabloids, which he considers responsible for the death of his mother, Diana Spencer. “You all know how the British press can be,” he told James Corden on his “Late Late Show”. “It destroyed my sanity, it was toxic. So I did everything any husband and father would do.”

His only will is to protect his wife and their children, Archie and Lilibet, fearing that they will suffer the same tragic fate as his own mother. In addition, when the official mourning for Queen Elizabeth II and the funeral was over, Prince Harry and his wife left Great Britain, headed for the United States. Separated for two weeks from their children, they now have only one urgency: to find them as soon as possible.

Video. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have left: they left the United Kingdom to find Archie and Lilibet!

Also read

>> Tributes to Elizabeth II: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle together, did they break protocol?

>> “Meghan Markle, pregnant?” : What if we stop speculating on other people’s pregnancies?

>> Death of Elizabeth II: George and Charlotte at the funeral, how Kate Middleton protected her children

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *